Journal cover Journal topic
Earth Surface Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.649 IF 2.649
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 2.688 IF 5-year
    2.688
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 2.64 CiteScore
    2.64
  • SNIP value: 0.628 SNIP 0.628
  • SJR value: indexed SJR
    indexed
  • IPP value: 1.689 IPP 1.689
  • h5-index value: 6 h5-index 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2017-50
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
04 Aug 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).
Bumps in river profiles: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Wolfgang Schwanghart1 and Dirk Scherler2,3 1University of Potsdam, Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, 14476 Potsdam - Golm, Germany
2GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Earth Surface Geochemistry, 14473 Potsdam , Germany
3Freie Universit├Ąt Berlin, Institute for Geological Sciences, 12249, Berlin, Germany
Abstract. The analysis of longitudinal river profiles is an important tool for studying landscape evolution. However, characterizing river profiles based on digital elevation models (DEM) suffers from errors and artifacts that particularly prevail along valley bottoms. The aim of this study is to characterize uncertainties that arise from the analysis of river profiles derived from different, near-globally available DEMs. We devised new algorithms – quantile carving and the CRS algorithm – that rely on quantile regression to enable hydrological correction and uncertainty quantification of river profiles. We find that globally available DEMs commonly overestimate river elevations in steep topography. The distributions of elevation errors become increasingly wider and right-skewed if adjacent hillslope gradients are steep. Our analysis indicates that the AW3D DEM has the highest precision and lowest bias for the analysis of river profiles in mountainous topography. The new 12-m resolution TanDEM-X DEM has a very low precision, most likely due to the combined effect of steep valley- walls and the presence of water surfaces in valley bottoms. Compared to the conventional approaches of carving and filling, we find that our new approach is able to reduce the elevation bias and errors in longitudinal river profiles.

Citation: Schwanghart, W. and Scherler, D.: Bumps in river profiles: the good, the bad, and the ugly, Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2017-50, in review, 2017.
Wolfgang Schwanghart and Dirk Scherler
Wolfgang Schwanghart and Dirk Scherler
Wolfgang Schwanghart and Dirk Scherler

Viewed

Total article views: 257 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
182 73 2 257 6 4 4

Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 257 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 250 with geography defined and 7 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 23 Aug 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
River profiles derived from digital elevation models are affected by errors. Here we present two new algorithms – quantile carving and the CRS algorithm – to hydrologically correct river profiles. Both algorithms preserve the downstream decreasing shape of river profiles while CRS additionally smooths profiles to avoid artificial steps. Our algorithms are able to cope with the problems of overestimation and asymmetric error distributions.
River profiles derived from digital elevation models are affected by errors. Here we present two...
Share